Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41518089›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental quality

Linking remote sensing with crop modeling for yield and nitrate leaching predictions in Minnesota.

Muhammad Tahir, David J Mulla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad TahirDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6668-0155
David J MullaDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7040-5888

Funding

Minnesota Department of Agriculture 195217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upscaling crop yield and nitrate-N leaching loss from experimental sites to large areas under alternative crop rotations is crucial for assessing strategies and setting goals to protect groundwater quality at a regional scale. Nitrogen (N) rate field trials were used to calibrate the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model for continuous-corn (Zea mays L.) (C-C), corn-soybean (Glycine max L.) (C-Sb), and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)-corn (A-C), with or without rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop. Satellite estimates of crop evapotranspiration (ET

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalEnvironmental MonitoringNitratesRemote Sensing TechnologyWater Pollutants, ChemicalFertilizersMinnesotaModels, TheoreticalZea maysFertilizersNitratesWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID41518089
PMCPMC12789989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.