Trial reportMuscle & nerve2026
Post Hoc, Sex-Specific Subgroup Analysis of Efgartigimod in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis From the ADAPT Trial: A Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines Approach.
Trial report in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03669588 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ARGX-113 in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis Having Generalized Muscle Weakness), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ARGX-113 in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis Having Generalized Muscle Weakness
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsSex-specific differences in myasthenia gravis (MG) are widely acknowledged, yet data on sex-based outcomes of MG treatment are scarce. In accordance with Sex and Gender Equity in Research guidelines, this post hoc analysis assessed potential sex-specific differences in treatment outcomes in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized (g)MG participants in the Phase 3 ADAPT trial (NCT03669588).
methodsParticipants received four once-weekly efgartigimod infusions (10 mg/kg) or placebo per cycle. Endpoints (primary: proportion of Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) responders (Cycle 1); secondary: proportion of Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and early (Cycle 1) MG-ADL responders, and time with clinically meaningful improvements in MG-ADL score; additional: quality of life outcomes, pharmacodynamics) were assessed according to sex.
resultsFemales were younger (mean age: 42.9 vs. 54.8 years), more likely to have undergone thymectomy (65.1% [56/86] vs. 44.2% [19/43]), and had higher baseline QMG scores (16.3 vs. 14.3) compared with males. Efgartigimod demonstrated homogeneous effects between sexes, with no significant difference in proportions of MG-ADL (p = 0.7014), early (Cycle 1) MG-ADL (p = 1.00), or QMG responders (p = 0.1595). Improvements in quality-of-life assessments, rates of minimal symptom expression, and mean total immunoglobulin G reductions (Cycle 1) were greater with efgartigimod verso placebo in females and males. Efgartigimod was well tolerated, with similar safety profiles across sexes. DISCUSSION: In ADAPT, efgartigimod-treated female and male AChR-Ab+ gMG patients had similar efficacy and safety outcomes. These data provide valuable insight for clinicians, given the established sex differences in MG disease course and treatment responses.
trial registrationThe ADAPT trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03669588).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.