Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41517947›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2026

Defining Life Stages and Mapping Care Trajectories: A Narrative Review of Life-Course Theories, Models and Frameworks.

Michael T Lawless, Matthew Tieu, Rebecca K Golley, Alison L Kitson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael T LawlessCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-6442
Matthew TieuCollege of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Rebecca K GolleyCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Alison L KitsonFaculty of Health, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-8381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo review how life-course theories, models and frameworks define and classify life stages and transitions; how they characterise trajectories of care needs and care provision; and to consider how these insights might inform future developments of care-focused life-course frameworks.

designNarrative review using a theory synthesis approach.

methodsThe review synthesised 56 theories, models and frameworks, drawn from 90 articles published up to 2024, using a three-stage process: extraction and summarisation of conceptual content; comparison to identify convergence and divergence; and interpretive synthesis to generate an overarching account of how frameworks conceptualise life-course development, care transitions and care trajectories.

resultsEarlier life-course perspectives emphasise normative, age-graded stages, while more recent approaches highlight transitional junctures, relational contexts and structural influences on care trajectories. Life stages were defined variably, encompassing developmental phases, chronological age bands, major life transitions, historical and cultural perspectives and diverse lived experiences. Trajectories of care needs and provision were shaped by social networks, socioeconomic conditions, timing of transitions, transgenerational relationships and interdependencies, and intersectionality. Findings suggest that care needs and care provision fluctuate across time and are best understood as interrelated, dynamic processes influenced by life-course biographies, as well as broader social, economic and policy environments at individual (micro), relational (meso) and structural (macro) levels.

conclusionLife-course frameworks are shifting from age-based models towards personalised, context-sensitive perspectives that better capture the complexity and diversity of care trajectories. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Care planning should incorporate not only developmental stage but also individual, relational and structural factors influencing care needs, care provision and care trajectories over time. IMPACT: Applying a personalised, multilevel life-course perspective may improve assessment accuracy, coordination of resources and equity in care delivery. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This narrative review did not involve patients or the public.

Indexed as

AgingLife History TraitsHumanscare needscare trajectoriesfundamental carelife courselife stagesnarrative reviewself‐care

Identifiers

PMID41517947
PMCPMC13460979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.