Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41517936›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2026

Reference Intervals for Lymphocyte Subpopulations in Healthy Chinese Han Adults: A Single-Center Study.

An-Na Jiang, Lin-Zi Miao, Yan Gong, Ran You, Yao Lu, Chen-Xue Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

An-Na JiangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lin-Zi MiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan GongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ran YouDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yao LuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chen-Xue QuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-9752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish reference intervals of lymphocyte subpopulations in the healthy Chinese Han adult population and to explore the relationship between the lymphocyte subpopulations and routine health indicators.

methodsWe enrolled 120 healthy individuals aged between 22 and 60. Flow cytometry was utilized to assess lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood samples. Variance analysis was conducted to determine reference intervals and to evaluate the effects of age and gender. Cluster analysis and correlation coefficient tests were employed to elucidate the relationships between lymphocyte subpopulations and routine health indicators.

resultsReference intervals of lymphocyte subpopulations among healthy adults were established. Significant differences between male and female were observed in the levels of central memory CD8

conclusionThis study not only established the normal reference intervals of lymphocyte subpopulations but also provided insights into the factors that may be related to these measurements, contributing valuable information for health management strategies.

Indexed as

East Asian PeopleHealthy VolunteersLymphocyte CountLymphocyte SubsetsAdultChinaFemaleFlow CytometryHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesYoung Adultflow cytometryinfluencing factorlymphocyte subpopulationsreference interval

Identifiers

PMID41517936
PMCPMC12888755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.