ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Impact of a Care Pathway for Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Before-and-After Study.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a Care Pathway for Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Before-and-After Study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life and functional recovery one year after emergency abdominal surgery in patients over 75 years: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery face high risks of mortality and complications.
objectiveInvestigate whether a care pathway designed for older patients improves surgical outcomes.
methodsThis single-centre study investigated the effect of a care pathway for older patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, including preoperative frailty assessment, optimised perioperative care, and structured decision-making for severely frail patients. Following implementation of the pathway, patients aged ≥ 75 years were prospectively enrolled in the 'after' cohort (1 January 2020-16 April 2021) and compared with a historical 'before' cohort of patients (1 January 2016-31 December 2017). The primary outcome was the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), a composite measure encompassing 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative mortality, the number of palliative patients, mortality at 1 and 3 years and postoperative complications.
resultsAmong 154 patients in the 'after' cohort (median age 82 years [Q1-Q3: 78-86], 54% women, 53% frail), the primary outcome did not differ significantly from that of the 170 patients in the 'before' cohort (CCI mean [95% CI]: 44 [39-48] vs. 50 [46-55]; p = 0.15). Postoperative 30-day mortality was significantly reduced (22% vs. 13%, p = 0.04). During the intervention, severely frail patients triaged to palliation (n = 12) were excluded from the study and received palliative care. High postoperative mortality was observed at 1 (31%) and 3 years (49%). Pulmonary (44% vs. 69%, p < 0.001) and gastrointestinal complications (39% vs. 52%; p = 0.02) were significantly reduced.
conclusionIn this 'before-and-after' study a care pathway designed for older patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery had no significant impact on the composite outcome of postoperative mortality and complications. Postoperative 30-day mortality, pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications were significantly reduced, while long-term mortality remained high. Although the results should be interpreted with caution, they highlight the importance of careful preoperative evaluation. In this study, outcomes of elderly patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery were compared before and after implementation of a care pathway for elderly patients in a moderately sized single centre. Overall it is noted that implementation of this care pathway resulted in a decision to offer palliation instead of surgery to several patients. While the primary outcome of comprehensive complication index did not differ between the before-and after groups, several secondary outcomes were improved in the after group. It should be noted however that multiple confounders could explain the difference, including selection bias of a more robust population offered surgery. The one-and three year mortality of both groups was very high, stressing the importance of a careful and critical assessment of preoperative comorbidity and frailty, as well as the importance of ensuring that the treatment offered aligns with the overall goals of care for the individual patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.