ReviewJournal of neurochemistry2026
Neurons in a Dish: A Review of In Vitro Cell Models for Studying Neurogenesis.
Review in Journal of neurochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV and Cocaine exposure promote Tau phosphorylation through RSK-1 in a GSK3β-independent manner.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neurons in a Dish: A Review of In Vitro Cell Models for Studying Neurogenesis.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding neurogenesis, the complex biological process of generating new neurons, is crucial for understanding brain development, function, and potential therapeutic interventions for neurological disorders. Due to the inherent difficulty of directly observing neurogenesis in the human brain, researchers heavily rely on cell models to simulate this process under controlled conditions. These models serve as invaluable tools to understand the mechanisms underlying the different stages of neurogenesis, helping researchers explore how neurons are generated, mature, and integrate into neural networks, thereby contributing to both normal brain function and neurological disorders. Therefore, this work provides a comprehensive overview of different cell models commonly used in neurogenesis research, from primary cultures and stem cells to immortalized cell lines. This compilation highlights the strengths and limitations of each cell model, which ultimately allows researchers to select the most appropriate model system for their research, thus enhancing the efforts towards unraveling the mysteries of the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.