ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2026
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: Evolving Approaches and Supporting Evidence.
Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of sintilimab-based neoadjuvant regimens in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Dihydrocapsaicin suppresses the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by upregulating TRPV1 expression.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026Article
- Dual-positive gastric cancer co-expressing AFP and CEA: an aggressive subtype defined by unique clinical and biological profiles.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Integrative Multiomics Analysis Reveals Tumor-Associated Macrophage Heterogeneity and a Prognostic Signature in Gastric Cancer.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Proposed Mechanisms of Electroacupuncture in Animal Models of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant and perioperative therapy have emerged as promising strategies for managing locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Landmark phase III studies, such as PRODIGY and RESOLVE, have established neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a viable therapeutic option in Asia. More recently, the MATTERHORN trial demonstrated the potential of incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into perioperative treatment. However, the use of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel in Asian populations warrants careful consideration, given regional treatment standards and concerns regarding chemotherapy-related toxicities, including neutropenia. This review summarizes key perioperative trials and highlights the evolving role of ICIs while also addressing emerging evidence on targeted therapies in LAGC. Key considerations include assessment of treatment response, as the validity of pathological response as a surrogate endpoint for survival remains unclear; risk- and biomarker-driven patient selection; and unresolved questions regarding the necessity and optimal duration of postoperative therapy. Personalizing postoperative treatment based on prognostic and molecular markers-including clinical stage, pathological response, and circulating tumor DNA status-represents an important next step toward improving outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.