ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2026
Perioperative Nutritional Treatment for Patients With Gastric Cancer: Focusing on Recent Controversial Issues.
Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of comprehensive nursing intervention in postoperative recovery of gastric cancer patients: a retrospective historical cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Health beliefs and quality of life in patients with gastric cancer: the chain mediating role of nutritional behaviors and nutritional status.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the many advances in treatment methods for gastric cancer, it remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with treatment outcomes intrinsically linked to the nutritional status of the patient. Malnutrition is a frequent and severe complication in patients with gastric cancer, arising from a confluence of factors including tumor-induced anorexia-cachexia syndrome, mechanical obstruction, and the metabolic stress of anti-cancer therapies including surgery and chemotherapy. Historically, nutritional support has often been a secondary consideration compared with surgical intervention or chemotherapy. However, a growing body of evidence has repositioned perioperative nutritional treatment as a cornerstone of comprehensive gastric cancer management. It is known that malnutrition can result in poorer clinical outcomes, including increased susceptibility to treatment-related toxicity, higher rates of postoperative complications, diminished quality of life, and a reduction in overall survival. Further, the paradigm shift toward proactive nutritional screening and assessment as standard clinical practice has allowed for timely and individualized prehabilitation. We conclude that advancements in nutritional science have fundamentally transformed gastric cancer management. The integration of tailored nutritional strategies throughout the journey of a patient from diagnosis through treatment and into survivorship is no longer just supportive, but a therapeutic modality in its own right. This symbiotic relationship emphasizes the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach, where oncologic and nutritional care are seamlessly interwoven to optimize patient outcomes and redefine the standards of gastric cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.