ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Maternal-Fetal Implications of Mpox Infection: Current Evidence.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mpox is an emerging zoonotic infection caused by the Monkeypox virus, an Orthopoxvirus with increasing global relevance following the 2022 multinational outbreak. Historically endemic to Central and West Africa, the disease has evolved from sporadic zoonotic transmission to sustained human-to-human spread, particularly through close physical and intimate contact. Clinical manifestations typically include fever, lymphadenopathy, and progressive mucocutaneous lesions, although severity varies according to viral clade, immune status, and comorbidities. The 2022 outbreak, predominantly associated with the Clade IIb variant, was characterized by milder disease, localized lesions, and reduced mortality compared with the more virulent Clade I variant. Despite this, severe outcomes remain possible, particularly in vulnerable groups such as children, pregnant individuals, immunocompromised patients, and persons with extensive dermatological disorders. Diagnosis relies primarily on polymerase chain reaction testing from lesion-derived samples, with genomic sequencing serving as a complementary tool for epidemiological surveillance. Management is largely supportive, though antivirals such as tecovirimat may be considered in severe cases or in high-risk populations. Data regarding therapeutic safety in pregnancy are limited; however, tecovirimat appears to have the most favorable profile, whereas cidofovir and brincidofovir remain contraindicated. Prevention strategies include targeted vaccination with the non-replicating Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic vaccine, used for both pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis, particularly in individuals at elevated risk. Given the evolving epidemiological profile, the potential for vertical transmission, and the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, Mpox infection during pregnancy poses unique clinical challenges. This review synthesizes current evidence on virology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prevention, and management, with an emphasis on obstetric considerations and public health implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.