ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-port robotic platform for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: system functionality and initial preclinical feasibility.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Evolution of coronary artery bypass grafting: conventional, minimally invasive, robotic, and hybrid revascularisation techniques.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Beyond Surgical Access: Evidence Supporting a Multidimensional Concept of Surgical Invasiveness in Contemporary Cardiac Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Current and Emerging Treatments for Isolated Aortic Stenosis and Concomitant Mitral Stenosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) was developed in the late 1990s and has taken giant strides over the last 30 years. Nowadays, it is an important part of the cardiac surgery practice, accounting for one-third of total heart surgeries globally, with remarkable results. It is mostly performed for Mitral Valve repair but also for Aortic Valve Replacement and coronary artery bypass. However, the chronological evolution that led MICS to its current status has never been properly described. The best format to share a historical journey is the state-of-the-art (SotA) review. To the best of our knowledge, there are no orthodox SotA reviews on MICS. The aim of our study is to describe the current key MICS techniques, their historical development, and to discuss their role in the future of our specialty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.