Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41517585›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Factors Affecting Postoperative Satisfaction After Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens.

Choul Yong Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Choul Yong ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2023-KH135936Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine(KFRM) grant funded by the Korea government(the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Health & Welfare) RS-2025-02073096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presbyopia-correcting IOLs have revolutionized cataract surgery by enabling functional vision across multiple focal distances, thereby reducing dependence on spectacles. These lenses-ranging from multifocal to extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) and hybrid designs-incorporate advanced optical technologies to address the limitations of traditional monofocal IOLs. Despite their clinical promise, patient satisfaction remains variable, with a substantial subset experiencing postoperative visual discomfort. This review provides a comprehensive overview of presbyopia-correcting IOL technologies, detailing their optical principles, design evolution, and clinical performance. It further analyzes the multifactorial causes of postoperative dissatisfaction, which include optical phenomena such as glare, halos, and reduced contrast sensitivity; ocular comorbidities like dry eye disease, corneal irregular astigmatism, glaucoma, and macular pathology; and surgical variables including IOL centration, pupil size, and biometry accuracy. Additionally, non-physiological factors-such as patient expectations, lifestyle demands, and psychological disposition-play a critical role in perceived outcomes. To address these challenges, the review explores evidence-based strategies for improving satisfaction. These include rigorous preoperative screening for ocular surface disease and aberrations, personalized lens selection based on anatomical and functional criteria, and thorough patient counseling to align expectations with achievable results. Emerging IOL designs that blend multifocal and EDOF features offer promising avenues for minimizing visual disturbances while preserving range of vision. By integrating optical innovation with individualized clinical care, ophthalmologists can enhance postoperative outcomes and optimize real-world satisfaction with presbyopia-correcting IOLs.

Indexed as

cataractEDOFintraocular lensmultifocalpresbyopiasatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41517585
PMCPMC12786824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.