ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: From Molecular Pathways to Therapeutic Targets-A Mechanism-to-Practice Framework Integrating Pharmacotherapy, Fall Prevention, and Adherence into Patient-Centered Care.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of abaloparatide, denosumab, teriparatide, oral bisphosphonates, and intravenous bisphosphonates in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- Future Directions in Hypercalcemic and Normocalcemic Primary Hyperparathyroidism: FRAXplus for 10-Year Fracture Risk Assessment (A Retrospective Study).Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Humic Acid Therapy Mitigates Estrogen Deficiency-Induced Alveolar Bone Loss and Modulates the RANKL/OPG Balance.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The next frontier in postmenopausal osteoporosis management lies not in novel pharmacological agents, but in the systematic integration of mechanism-guided drug selection, fall prevention, and long-term adherence strategies into a unified patient-centered care model. This review is intended for clinicians and clinical researchers involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. We provide a mechanism-to-practice framework that explicitly maps each therapeutic class to the specific molecular pathway it targets: bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast function downstream of RANKL activation; denosumab blocks RANKL directly at the cytokine level; romosozumab inhibits sclerostin to restore Wnt-mediated bone formation. This mechanistic foundation supports a risk-stratified treatment paradigm in which antiresorptives address accelerated remodeling in moderate-risk patients, while patients at very high fracture risk-characterized by severe bone deficit or recent fragility fractures-benefit from an anabolic-first approach followed by consolidation. Beyond drug selection, we examine the persistent treatment gap in which fewer than 20% of post-fracture patients receive therapy, arguing that fall prevention-responsible for >90% of hip fractures-and medication adherence deserve equal priority in clinical practice. We further analyze key controversies, including T-score- versus FRAX-based intervention thresholds, limitations of the trabecular bone score, cost-effectiveness constraints on anabolic-first sequencing, and evidence gaps in post-denosumab transition strategies. By synthesizing mechanistic insights, guideline recommendations, and critical appraisal of current limitations, this review offers not only an overview of existing knowledge but a coherent decision-support model aimed at improving fracture prevention through comprehensive, individualized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.