ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Health Literacy and Associated Factors Among Military Personnel: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lithuania.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth literacy is increasingly recognized as an essential determinant of health, readiness, and safety in the military, especially as health systems become more digitalized. However, evidence on general and digital health literacy in the armed forces remains limited. This study examined levels of general health literacy and digital health literacy among Lithuanian soldiers and explored their associations with sociodemographic, service-related, and health characteristics.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 603 military personnel serving in the national armed forces. General and digital health literacy were measured with HLS19-Q12 and HLS19-DIGI. Data on sociodemographic and military characteristics, self-rated health, and self-reported long-term illnesses were collected. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and multivariable regression models were used to analyze the data.
resultsThe sample was predominantly male (81.9%) with a mean age of 39.08 years (SD = 8.89). The mean general health literacy score was 80.1 (SD = 19.17), whereas the mean digital health literacy score was 67.81 (SD = 30.05). Overall, 45.0% of soldiers had excellent general health literacy, and 12.0% had inadequate general health literacy; 42.1% had excellent digital health literacy, and 35% had inadequate digital health literacy. Higher levels of health literacy were positively associated with better self-rated health and social status. No statistically significant associations were found between health literacy and gender, age, education, length of service, type of military service, and self-reported long-term health complaints.
conclusionsMilitary personnel in this study displayed relatively high general health literacy, yet digital health literacy was lower and more unevenly distributed, indicating a potential vulnerability for health outcomes as access to information, communication, and care increasingly relies on digital platforms. Given the cross-sectional design, causal inferences cannot be drawn. Military health services may build on existing health literacy strengths while considering strategies to address digital health literacy gaps (e.g., targeted training, tailored support, and user-friendly digital solutions, including service design), acknowledging that feasibility and implementation depend on organizational context and resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.