Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41517028›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advancing a Hybrid Decision-Making Model in Anesthesiology: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Setting.

Gilberto Duarte-Medrano, Natalia Nuño-Lámbarri, Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Luigi La Via, Simona Tutino, Guillermo Dominguez-Cherit, Massimiliano Sorbello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gilberto Duarte-MedranoAnesthesiology Department of Hospital Medica Sur, Mexico City 11510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4929-7111
Natalia Nuño-LámbarriTranslational Research Unit, Medica Sur Clinic & Foundation, Mexico City 11510, Mexico.
Daniele Salvatore PaternòDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital "Giovanni Paolo II", ASP Ragusa, 97100 Ragusa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-0215-5620
Luigi La ViaDepartment of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-7554
Simona TutinoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital "Giovanni Paolo II", ASP Ragusa, 97100 Ragusa, Italy.
Guillermo Dominguez-CheritAnesthesiology Department of Hospital Medica Sur, Mexico City 11510, Mexico.
Massimiliano SorbelloDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital "Giovanni Paolo II", ASP Ragusa, 97100 Ragusa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9331-2788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming anesthesiology practice across perioperative settings. This review explores the evolution and implementation of hybrid decision-making models that integrate AI capabilities with human clinical expertise. From historical foundations to current applications, we examine how machine learning algorithms, deep learning networks, and big data analytics are enhancing anesthetic care. Key applications include perioperative risk prediction, AI-assisted patient education, automated analysis of clinical records, airway management support, predictive hemodynamic monitoring, closed-loop anesthetic delivery systems, and pain management optimization. In procedural contexts, AI demonstrates promising utility in regional anesthesia through anatomical structure identification and needle navigation, monitoring anesthetic depth via EEG analysis, and improving quality control in endoscopic sedation. Educational applications include intelligent simulators for procedural training and academic productivity tools. Despite significant advances, implementation challenges persist, including algorithmic bias, data security concerns, clinical validation requirements, and ethical considerations regarding AI-generated content. The optimal integration model emphasizes a complementary approach where AI augments rather than replaces clinical judgment-combining computational efficiency with the irreplaceable contextual understanding and ethical reasoning of the anesthesiologist. This hybrid paradigm reinforces the anesthesiologist's leadership role in perioperative care while enhancing safety, precision, and efficiency through technological innovation. As AI integration advances, continued emphasis on algorithmic transparency, rigorous clinical validation, and human oversight remains essential to ensure that these technologies enhance rather than compromise patient-centered anesthetic care.

Indexed as

anesthesiologyartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportmachine learningperioperative care

Identifiers

PMID41517028
PMCPMC12785261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.