ArticlePolymers2025
Fabrication of a Superhydrophobic Surface via Wet Etching of a Polydimethylsiloxane Micropillar Array.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Superhydrophobic surfaces have gained considerable attention due to their ability to repel water and reduce surface adhesion, and they are now widely applied for self-cleaning, anti-fouling, anti-icing, and corrosion resistance purposes. In this study, either a computer numerical control (CNC) machine or photolithographic techniques were employed to fabricate molds with microwells, followed by soft lithography to obtain a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) micropillar array. An etching process was then carried out. It was found that, as etching time increased, the diameters of micropillars decreased, leading to a decrease in the solid fraction of the composite surface and increases in contact angles. When the ratios of spacing to diameter (W/D) and of height to diameter (H/D) both exceeded 1.5, the contact angle was found to exceed 150° and the original PDMS micropillar surface with a contact angle of around 135° became superhydrophobic. A drastic decrease in sliding angle was also observed at this threshold. Changes in contact angles with different W/D values were in good agreement with values calculated using the Cassie-Baxter equation, and the droplet state was verified by a pressure balance model. Meanwhile, the PDMS etching rate when using acetone as the solvent was approximately 6-8 times faster than that when using 1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), a result which is comparable to data in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.