ArticlePolymers2025
Comparison Between Ultrasound and High-Pressure Homogenization for Encapsulation of β-Carotene in CNF-Stabilized Pickering Emulsions.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D bioprinting innovations: a new frontier in breast cancer research.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work investigated the stabilization mechanisms and β-carotene encapsulation characteristics of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) stabilized Pickering emulsions (PE) prepared by different emulsification processes. For 48 days of storage, ultrasound-prepared Pickering emulsions (US-PE) stabilized by at least 2.0 wt.% CNFs have obvious cream stabilization, and high-pressure homogenization-prepared Pickering emulsions (HPH-PE) stabilized by over 1.6 wt.% CNFs have excellent cream stabilization. The stabilization of HPH-PE, which was superior to that of US-PE, mainly relied on the steric stabilization of CNFs' space networks. Although the encapsulation efficiency of β-carotene in US-PE was higher than that in HPH-PE when the CNF concentration was over 1.2 wt.%, the retention rate of β-carotene in US-PE was obviously lower than that in HPH-PE. So, the internal space structure of CNF-stabilized HPH-PE was conducive to stabilizing the emulsion and protecting the bioactive molecule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.