Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41516894›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

PEEK/PEI Polymer Blends for Fused Filament Fabrication: Processing, Properties, and Printability.

Conor McCrickard, Adrian Boyd, Krzysztof Rodzen, Edward Archer, Faisal Manzoor, Jawad Ullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Conor McCrickardSchool of Engineering, University of Ulster, York Street, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK.
Adrian BoydSchool of Engineering, University of Ulster, York Street, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4932-4770
Krzysztof RodzenSchool of Engineering, University of Ulster, York Street, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK.
Edward ArcherSchool of Engineering, University of Ulster, York Street, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1017-1500
Faisal ManzoorSchool of Engineering, University of Ulster, York Street, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-2198
Jawad UllahSchool of Engineering, University of Ulster, York Street, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4441-1277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Printing with high-performance polymers such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and polyetherimide (PEI) presents issues regarding shrinkage and warpage due to elevated temperatures. One method highlighted to mitigate against this is through polymer blending. This study explores the development and characterization of PEEK and PEI blends as filament for fused filament fabrication (FFF) in additive manufacturing. Filaments were produced via melt extrusion using PEEK/PEI weight ratios 100/0, 80/20, 70/30, 60/40, 50/50, 40/60, 20/80, and 0/100 (wt.%). The aim is to identify an optimum blend which enhances printability and maintains mechanical and thermal integrity. The extruded filaments were first characterized through differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to determine miscibility with all ratios presenting a single glass transition temperature. Samples were then 3D-printed and assessed through mechanical testing, DSC, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The PEEK/PEI 80/20 (wt.%) blend was recognized as the optimum blend for maintaining crystallinity (35%) as well as good mechanical properties, averaging ultimate tensile strengths (UTSs) of 75.6 MPa and a Young's modulus of 1338 MPa. Thermal properties also improved while warpage reduced and printability improved.

Indexed as

3D printingcrystallinitymechanical propertiespolyether ether ketonepolyetherimide

Identifiers

PMID41516894
PMCPMC12787488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.