ArticlePolymers2025
Pine Bark as a Lignocellulosic Resource for Polyurethane Production: An Evaluation.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the potential of pine bark-a highly accessible and underexploited by-product of forestry and food processing-as a renewable raw material for rigid polyurethane (PUR) foam production. Under optimal extraction conditions, water-soluble extractives rich in carbohydrates were isolated from biomass with a yield of 25% and subsequently condensed with propylene carbonate (PC) to produce bio-based polyols. The polyols synthesized at a PC/OH molar ratio ranging from 1 to 5 were incorporated into rigid PUR foam formulations as substitutes for commercial polyether polyols. The foams containing bio-polyols synthesized at a PC/OH ratio of 3 demonstrated the highest compressive strength and thermal insulation performance, exceeding those of the reference material by 30% and 9%, respectively, and exhibited enhanced thermo-oxidative stability. Incorporation of extracted bark up to 10 wt% as a filler in the PUR matrix led to a decrease in mechanical properties to the level of the reference foam and a 19% reduction in thermal insulation capacity, without affecting the closed-cell content. Cone calorimetry revealed that both filled and unfilled bio-polyol-based PUR foams exhibited lower degradation rate, heat release rate, and total smoke release compared with the reference material, indicating reduced flammability and a lower tendency toward fire propagation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.