ArticlePolymers2025
Optimization of Injection Molding Processing Parameters for Thin-Walled Plastic Parts Manufactured for the Automotive Industry.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fabrication of thin-walled plastic parts has potential in the automotive industry in terms of sustainability and circular economy targets to decrease any harmful effects on the ecosystems, cost and performance. Injection molding of thin-walled automotive parts is more complex in terms of processing defects compared to traditional plastic parts. Optimization of processing parameters is of critical importance to solving problems and defects in the production of thin-walled parts. In this study, the flow length and weight of thin-walled spiral parts (with wall thicknesses of 0.50, 1.50, 2.70 and 3.00 mm) were investigated with theoretical and experimental studies. The theoretical flow length and weight of the thin-walled spiral parts were determined by Moldflow analysis according to the pressure and wall thickness. The correlation graph between theoretical results and experimental measurements was obtained. When the wall thickness of the thin-walled spiral parts increased, the flow length of the thin-walled spiral parts increased. As a result, it was found that the thin-walled spiral part mold could not be filled for wall thicknesses of 0.50 and 1.50 mm at maximum pressure due to decreasing temperature at the flow front. In addition, the thin-walled spiral part mold can be filled for a wall thickness of 2.70 and 3.00 mm. In the correlation study conducted for these values, an agreement of approximately 90% was achieved. However, it was also observed that as the pressure increases, the deviation between the experimental and theoretical results becomes more pronounced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.