ArticlePolymers2025
Investigation into the Reprocessability of Polycarbonate/Organoclay Nanocomposites.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid expansion in the use of nanomaterials, ensuring their reprocessability has become a critical consideration for the sustainable development of polymer-based nanocomposites. In this study, the effects of repetitive thermo-mechanical processing cycles on the properties of polycarbonate (PC)/organoclay nanocomposites, as well as the impact of reactive extrusion of reprocessed PC/organoclay nanocomposites using a chain extender, were investigated for the first time. The nanocomposites were processed three times using a twin-screw extruder, and a multi-anhydride functional chain extender was incorporated to counteract the thermo-mechanical degradation observed after the third extrusion cycle. Morphological analysis indicated that the delamination of clay nanolayers within the polymer matrix was slightly enhanced with increasing extrusion cycles, while the addition of the chain extender further promoted nanoclay exfoliation. Despite the improved clay dispersion in PC, both rheological and tensile measurements revealed the detrimental effects of repeated reprocessing on the nanocomposites. The chain extender effectively mitigated this degradation by relinking cleaved polymer chains; consequently, the complex viscosity and storage modulus at 0.1 Hz of the three-times-extruded nanocomposite increased by 248% and 426%, respectively, following chain extender incorporation. The effectiveness of the chain extender was further evidenced by a 27% enhancement in tensile strength. The glass transition temperatures of the samples were not significantly affected by either the extrusion cycles or the addition of the chain extender. The thermal stability of the nanocomposites decreased with increasing numbers of extrusion cycles; however, the incorporation of the chain extender imparted enhanced resistance to thermal degradation, as confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.