ArticlePolymers2025
Influence of Training-Testing Data Variation on ML-Based Deflection Prediction of GFRP-Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Beams.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)-reinforced concrete beams have gained significant prominence in structural engineering due to their advantageous mechanical and durability characteristics. However, the influence of training-testing data partitioning on machine learning (ML)-based deflection prediction for such members remains insufficiently explored. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the predictive performance of the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) regression algorithm in estimating the load-deflection behavior of GFRP-reinforced high-strength concrete beams. The experimental program comprised nine beams manufactured with concrete strength classes C45, C50, and C65, followed by ML-based deflection analyses using multiple data-splitting strategies. Findings indicate that the KNN model employing an 80:20 training-testing ratio provides the most accurate deflection predictions, achieving approximately 80% agreement with experimental results, while a higher prediction accuracy of approximately 85% was observed for beams with the highest concrete compressive strength (C65). Experimentally recorded deflections ranged from approximately 20 mm to values exceeding 50 mm, depending on the concrete strength class and loading level. Owing to its superior performance, the KNN model with an 80:20 training-testing ratio is recommended for predicting the deflection capacities of GFRP-reinforced high-strength concrete members. The study further examined the structural response associated with the use of GFRP as longitudinal tensile reinforcement. A consistent failure mechanism was observed across all beams, characterized by the formation of a single, wide vertical crack initiating at the beam's soffit, regardless of concrete strength class. These observations contribute to a deeper understanding of the flexural behavior and fracture characteristics of GFRP-reinforced high-strength concrete beams and provide a foundation for future modeling efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.