Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41516798›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Crack Development and Healing in Guar Gum Polymer-Modified Silty Clay Under Natural Wetting-Drying Cycles.

Wanxin Hou, Xiyan Jiang, Xu Wang, Dameng Wang, Daye Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wanxin HouCollege of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, China.
Xiyan JiangCollege of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, China.
Xu WangCollege of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, China.
Dameng WangCollege of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, China.
Daye DuCollege of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the evolution characteristics of fissure networks in cohesive soils under wetting-drying cycle conditions with varying guar gum content. Four wetting-drying cycles were conducted under outdoor natural conditions, with real-time monitoring of changes in the surface crack network during drying and wetting. Geometric parameters-including surface crack density, width, connectivity coefficient, shape coefficient, and crack depth ratio-were quantitatively analyzed using digital image processing software. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were employed to reveal the mechanisms of microstructural improvement. Results indicate that as wetting-drying cycles increase, the fracture network progressively simplifies, with fracture density and fractal dimension decreasing while fracture width increases. The incorporation of guar gum reduced the crack depth ratio to approximately 0.62 times that of undamaged soil. The average crack width decreased from 2.69 mm to 2.16 mm during the fourth wet-dry cycle, whilst the connectivity coefficient and shape coefficient stabilized. SEM analysis indicated that guar gum promoted "bonded bridging" structures between soil particles, while XRD results confirmed no alteration in the mineral composition of the soil. The study demonstrates that the addition of guar gum enhances soil crack resistance and stability, providing theoretical support for the ecological protection of clayey slopes.

Indexed as

connectivity coefficientcrack depth ratioguar gum polymermicrostructurewetting–drying cycles

Identifiers

PMID41516798
PMCPMC12787747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.