ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
GRU-Based Deep Multimodal Fusion of Speech and Head-IMU Signals in Mixed Reality for Parkinson's Disease Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) alters both speech and movement, yet most automated assessments still treat these signals separately. We examined whether combining voice with head motion improves discrimination between patients and healthy controls (HC). Synchronous measurements of acoustic and inertial signals were collected using a HoloLens 2 headset. Data were obtained from 165 participants (72 PD/93 HC), following a standardized mixed-reality (MR) protocol. We benchmarked single-modality models against fusion strategies under 5-fold stratified cross-validation. Voice alone was robust (pooled AUC ≈ 0.865), while the inertial channel alone was near chance (AUC ≈ 0.497). Fusion provided a modest but repeatable improvement: gated early-fusion achieved the highest AUC (≈0.875), cross-attention fusion was comparable (≈0.873). Gains were task-dependent. While speech-dominated tasks were already well captured by audio, tasks that embed movement benefited from complementary inertial data. Proposed MR capture proved feasible within a single session and showed that motion acts as a conditional improvement factor rather than a sole predictor. The results outline a practical path to multimodal screening and monitoring for PD, preserving the reliability of acoustic biomarkers while integrating kinematic features when they matter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.