ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quality Assessment of a Foot-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit System to Measure On-Field Spatiotemporal Acceleration Metrics.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: The use of wearable technology for assessing running biomechanics in field-based sports has increased in recent years. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are low-cost, non-invasive devices capable of estimating spatiotemporal gait-related metrics during overground locomotion. This study evaluated the accuracy and concurrent validity of a foot-mounted IMU system for estimating sprinting kinematics. (2) Method: Twenty-five elite and sub-elite athletes completed four maximal 10-metre fly efforts, with their kinematics measured concurrently using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and IMUs. (3) Result: The foot-mounted IMU system's root mean square errors for stride length and duration were 0.22 m and 0.04 s, respectively. Mean biases (95% level of agreement) were -0.67 m · s-1 (-1.19; -0.14) for peak velocity, -0.51 m · s-1 (-1.10; 0.09) for instantaneous velocity, and 0.17 m · s-2 (-1.04; 1.37) for instantaneous acceleration. Stride length, duration, and cadence were -0.07 m (-0.36; 0.23), 0.02 s (-0.02; 0.06), and -4.64 strides · min-1 (-15.82; 6.53), respectively. (4) Conclusions: End users implementing this technology in research and practice should interpret this study's findings relative to their analytical objectives, logistical resources, and operational constraints. Therefore, its adoption should be guided by the specific performance metrics of interest and the extent to which the system's capabilities align with the outcomes the end user aims to achieve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.