ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Low-Cost Non-Contact Vision-Based Wheel Arch Detection for End-of-Line Stage.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the collaborative requirements of high precision, high efficiency, low cost, and non-contact measurement for wheel arch detection in the calibration of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) during vehicle production, this study proposes a monocular machine vision-based detection methodology. The hardware system incorporates an industrial camera, priced at approximately 1000 CNY, and a custom light source. The YOLOv5s model is employed for rapid localization of the wheel hub, while the MSER algorithm, in conjunction with Canny edge detection, is utilized for robust feature extraction of the wheel arch. A geometric computation model, referenced to the wheel hub, is subsequently established to quantify the wheel arch height. Experimental results indicate that, for seven vehicle models, the method achieves an average absolute error (MAE) of ≤0.25 mm, with a maximum error of ≤0.545 mm and a single measurement time of ≤3.2 s, making it suitable for a 60 JPH production line. Additionally, under lighting conditions ranging from 500 to 1500 lux and dust concentrations of ≤10 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.