SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Systematic Review of Federated and Cloud Computing Approaches for Predicting Mental Health Risks.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health disorders affect large numbers of people worldwide and are a major cause of long-term disability. Digital health technologies such as mobile apps and wearable devices now generate rich behavioural data that could support earlier detection and more personalised care. However, these data are highly sensitive and distributed across devices and platforms, which makes privacy protection and scalable analysis challenging; federated learning offers a way to train models across devices while keeping raw data local. When combined with edge, fog, or cloud computing, federated learning offers a way to support near-real-time mental health analysis while keeping raw data local. This review screened 1104 records, assessed 31 full-text articles using a five-question quality checklist, and retained 17 empirical studies that achieved a score of at least 7/10 for synthesis. The included studies were compared in terms of their FL and edge/cloud architectures, data sources, privacy and security techniques, and evidence for operation in real-world settings. The synthesis highlights innovative but fragmented progress, with limited work on comorbidity modelling, deployment evaluation, and common benchmarks, and identifies priorities for the development of scalable, practical, and ethically robust FL systems for digital mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.