ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Impact of the Accelerometer Sampling Rate on the Performance of Machine and Deep Learning Models in Wearable Fall-Detection Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population aging has intensified the prevalence of falls among older adults, making automatic Fall Detection Systems (FDS) a key component of telemonitoring and remote care. Among wearable-based approaches, inertial sensors, particularly accelerometers, offer an effective and low-cost alternative for continuous monitoring. However, the impact of the selection of the sampling frequency on model performance remains insufficiently explored. This work seeks to determine the sampling rate that best balances accuracy, stability, and computational efficiency in wearable FDS. Five representative algorithms (CNN-LSTM, CNN, LSTM-BN, k-NN, and SVM) were trained and evaluated using the SisFall dataset at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz, followed by a multi-stage validation including the real-fall repositories FARSEEING and Free From Falls, as well as a seven-day continuous monitoring test under real-life conditions. The results show that deep learning architectures consistently outperform traditional classifiers, with the CNN-LSTM model at 20 Hz achieving the best balance of accuracy (98.9%), sensitivity (96.7%), and specificity (99.6%), while maintaining stable performance across all validations. The observed consistency indicates that intermediate frequencies, around 20 Hz and down to 10 Hz, provide sufficient temporal resolution to capture fall dynamics while reducing data volume, which translates into more efficient energy usage compared to higher sampling rates. Overall, these findings establish a solid empirical foundation for designing next-generation wearable fall-detection systems that are more autonomous, robust, and sustainable in long-term IoT-based monitoring environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.