Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41516595›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

MOSOF with NDCI: A Cross-Subsystem Evaluation of an Aircraft for an Airline Case Scenario.

Burak Suslu, Fakhre Ali, Ian K Jennions

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Burak SusluIntegrated Vehicle Health Management Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9108-1261
Fakhre AliIntegrated Vehicle Health Management Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.
Ian K JennionsIntegrated Vehicle Health Management Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5752-1873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing cost-effective, reliable diagnostic sensor suites for complex assets remains challenging due to conflicting objectives across stakeholders. A holistic framework that integrates the Normalised Diagnostic Contribution Index (NDCI)-which scores sensors by separation power, severity sensitivity, and uniqueness-with a Multi-Objective Sensor Optimisation Framework (MOSOF) is presented. Using a high-fidelity virtual aircraft model coupling engine, fuel, electrical power system (EPS), and environmental control system (ECS), NDCI against minimum Redundancy-maximum Relevance (mRMR) is benchmarked under a rigorous nested cross-validation protocol. Across subsystems, NDCI yields more compact suites and higher diagnostic accuracy, notably for engine (88.6% vs. 69.0%) and ECS (67.7% vs. 52.0%). Then, a multi-objective optimisation reflecting an airline use-case (diagnostic performance, cost, reliability, and benefit-to-cost) is executed, identifying a practical Pareto-optimal 'knee' solution comprising 12-14 sensors. The recommended suite delivers a normalised performance of ≈0.69 at ≈USD36k with ≈145 kh MTBF, balancing the cross-subsystem information value with implementation constraints. The NDCI-MOSOF workflow provides a transparent, reproducible pathway from raw multi-sensor data to stakeholder-aware design decisions, and constitutes transferable evidence for model-based safety and certification processes in Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM). The limitations (simulation bias, cost/MTBF estimates), validation on rigs or in-service fleets, and extensions to prognostics objectives are discussed.

Indexed as

aircraftairlinesECSengineIVHMMOSOFmRMRmulti-objective optimisationNDCIsensor selection

Identifiers

PMID41516595
PMCPMC12788373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.