ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Vision-Based Hand Function Evaluation with Soft Robotic Rehabilitation Glove.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Sensor-Based Upper-Limb and Hand Exoskeletons for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Technical and Biomedical Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in robotic technology for hand rehabilitation, particularly soft robotic gloves, have significant potential to improve patient outcomes. While vision-based algorithms pave the way for fast and convenient hand pose estimation, most current models struggle to accurately track hand movements when soft robotic gloves are used, primarily due to severe occlusion. This limitation reduces the applicability of soft robotic gloves in digital and remote rehabilitation assessment. Furthermore, traditional clinical assessments like the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) rely on manual measurements and subjective scoring scales, lacking the efficiency and quantitative accuracy needed to monitor hand function recovery in data-driven personalised rehabilitation. Consequently, few integrated evaluation systems provide reliable quantitative assessments. In this work, we propose an RGB-based evaluation system for soft robotic glove applications, which is aimed at bridging these gaps in assessing hand function. By incorporating the Hand Mesh Reconstruction (HaMeR) model fine-tuned with motion capture data, our hand estimation framework overcomes occlusion and enables accurate continuous tracking of hand movements with reduced errors. The resulting functional metrics include conventional clinical benchmarks such as the mean per joint angle error (MPJAE) and range of motion (ROM), providing quantitative, consistent measures of rehabilitation progress and achieving tracking errors lower than 10°. In addition, we introduce adapted benchmarks such as the angle percentage of correct keypoints (APCK), mean per joint angular velocity error (MPJAVE) and angular spectral arc length (SPARC) error to characterise movement stability and smoothness. This extensible and adaptable solution demonstrates the potential of vision-based systems for future clinical and home-based rehabilitation assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.