ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Lightweight Deep Learning Model for Classification of Normal and Abnormal Vasculature in Organoid Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human organoids are 3D cell culture models that precisely replicate the microenvironment of real organs. In organoid-based experiments, assessing whether the internal vasculature has formed normally is essential for ensuring the reliability of experimental results. However, conventional vasculature assessment relies on manual inspection by researchers, which is time-consuming and prone to variability caused by subjective judgment. This study proposes a lightweight deep learning model for automatic classification of normal and abnormal vasculature in vascular organoid images. The proposed model is based on EfficientNet by replacing the activation function SiLU with ReLU and removing the Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks to reduce computational complexity. The dataset consisted of vascular organoid images obtained from co-culture experiments. Data augmentation and noise addition were performed to alleviate class imbalance. Experimental results show that the proposed Modified 3 models (B0, B1, B2) achieved accuracy of 0.90, 0.99, and 1.00, respectively, with corresponding inference speed of 51.1, 36.0, and 32.4 FPS on the CPU, demonstrating real-time inference capability and an average speed improvement of 70% compared to the original models. This study presents an efficient automated analysis framework that enables quantitative and reproducible vasculature assessment by introducing a lightweight model that maintains high accuracy and supports real-time processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.