Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41516516›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Event-Based Vision Application on Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: A Systematic Review of Prospects and Challenges.

Ibrahim Akanbi, Michael Ayomoh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ibrahim AkanbiDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-0818
Michael AyomohDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3752-0486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event camera vision systems have recently been gaining traction as swift and agile sensing devices in the field of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Despite their inherent superior capabilities covering high dynamic range, microsecond-level temporary resolution, and robustness to motion distortion which allow them to capture fast and subtle scene changes that conventional frame-based cameras often miss, their utilization has yet to be widespread. This is due to challenges like insufficient real-world validation, unstandardized simulation platforms, limited hardware integration and a lack of ground truth datasets. This systematic review paper presents an investigation that seeks to explore the dynamic vision sensor christened event camera and its integration to (UAVs). The review synthesized peer-reviewed articles between 2015 and 2025 across five thematic domains, datasets, simulation tools, algorithmic paradigms, application areas and future directions, using the Scopus and Web of Science databases. This review reveals that event cameras outperformed traditional frame-based systems in terms of latency and robustness to motion blur and lighting conditions, enabling reactive and precise UAV control. However, challenges remain in standardizing evaluation metrics, improving hardware integration, and expanding annotated datasets, which are vital for adopting event cameras as reliable components in autonomous UAV systems.

Indexed as

dynamic vision sensorevent cameranavigationneuromorphic sensorobstacle avoidancepath planningunmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

Identifiers

PMID41516516
PMCPMC12787784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.