Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41516192›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

DNA Persistent Length in Solutions of Different pH.

Nina Kasyanenko, Bolorkhuu Khansetsen, Andrey Baryshev, Petr Sokolov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina KasyanenkoDepartment of Physics, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Bolorkhuu KhansetsenDepartment of Physics, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0009-0009-5795-3973
Andrey BaryshevDepartment of Physics, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Petr SokolovDepartment of Physics, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4819-3211

Funding

The project was supported by grant RSF 22-25-00302. RSF 22-25-00302.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the changes in the DNA native conformation induced by pH changes in the alkaline and acidic regions were examined. It was shown by the methods of low gradient viscometry and flow birefringence that protonation and deprotonation of nitrogen bases inside the double helix cause a change in the persistent length of DNA. The pK values shift with the change in the ionic strength of the solution (NaCl concentration). The additional charges appearing on the DNA bases are not shielded by counterions from the solution. The increase and decrease in the volume of the DNA coil in solution resulting from protonation and deprotonation of base pairs, respectively, are mainly determined by changes in the persistent length of the macromolecule. The stability of the double-helical conformation of DNA ensures the steadiness of the equilibrium rigidity of this macromolecule. The emergence of charges on the bases, resulting from DNA protonation or deprotonation, weakens and even disrupts the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases. However, at the first stage, this occurs without altering the stacking interactions of base pairs, as reflected in the absorption spectra of DNA and in the stability of the DNA persistent length at different pH levels.

Indexed as

DNABase PairingHydrogen BondingHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNucleic Acid ConformationOsmolar ConcentrationProtonsSolutionsDNAProtonsSolutionsdifferent ionic strengthsDNA persistent lengthprotonation and deprotonation

Identifiers

PMID41516192
PMCPMC12785266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.