ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Current Controversies on Adequate Circulating Vitamin D Levels in CKD.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential value of vitamin D as adjunctive therapy in osteoarticular tuberculosis: a comprehensive review.Infection · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: shared mechanisms, disease-specific signatures, and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Management of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) has evolved dramatically over the past five decades, driven by discoveries that have fundamentally reshaped our understanding of the vitamin D endocrine system and its role in disease progression. This review synthesizes the key pathophysiological insights and clinical evidence underlying three critical paradigm shifts. The first shift moved beyond simple calcitriol replacement with the development of selective vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) designed to minimize hypercalcemia while maximizing PTH suppression. Crucially, these analogs revealed unexpected survival benefits, suggesting protective VDR actions extending beyond mineral metabolism. The second shift recognized the profound prevalence and independent mortality risk associated with nutritional vitamin D (25(OH)D) deficiency in CKD. This highlighted the kidney's complex role in maintaining systemic 25(OH)D supply and the importance of extrarenal vitamin D activation, although optimal assessment, targets, and supplementation strategies remain highly controversial due to CKD-specific pathophysiology (e.g., megalin loss, impaired uptake, obesity effects) and complex dosing paradoxes. The third, and most impactful, shift centers on the FGF23-Klotho axis. Pathologically high FGF23 is now established as a direct cardiovascular and skeletal toxin, acting via Klotho-independent pathways in CKD, while the profound deficiency of the protective, anti-aging hormone Klotho exacerbates systemic damage (inflammation, oxidative stress, impaired autophagy). This creates a major therapeutic dilemma, as VDRAs induce protective Klotho but worsen toxic FGF23, while calcimimetics do not increase FGF23 but offer no Klotho benefit. Furthermore, this complex interplay is obscured by significant limitations in accurately measuring FGF23 isoforms, soluble Klotho, and true vitamin D status. These paradigm shifts reveal a complex pathophysiology far beyond simple PTH control, demanding a move towards nuanced, potentially combined therapeutic strategies that balance FGF23 burden with Klotho preservation. Overcoming the profound diagnostic limitations to accurately monitor this axis and guide personalized therapy represents the critical next frontier in improving outcomes for patients with CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.