Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41515908›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

A Flame-Retardant Cyclophosphazene as an Electrolyte Component for Si-Graphite Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Yulia Vlasova, Sergei Potapov, Mikhail Kokontsev, Shakhboz Isokjanov, Olesia Karakulina, Alena Komayko, Alina Inozemtseva, Viacheslav Savin, Lidiya Minaeva, Alexandra Ageshina and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yulia VlasovaMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8624-8589
Sergei PotapovMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0009-0005-9216-8787
Mikhail KokontsevMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0009-0000-4055-1489
Shakhboz IsokjanovMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-9039
Olesia KarakulinaMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-939X
Alena KomaykoMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0009-0009-1643-6566
Alina InozemtsevaMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4466-4314
Viacheslav SavinN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-8438-740X
Lidiya MinaevaMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6373-6400
Alexandra AgeshinaMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5313-5812
Aleksandra RzhevskaiaMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-806X
Valery KrivetskiyMoscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow 123592, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2247-9388

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Goszadaniye) 075-03-2025-662, project No. FSMG-2024-0046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicon-graphite anodes offer a practical route to increase the energy density of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), but their widespread adoption is hampered by cyclic instability due to huge volume changes of silicon during lithiation/delithiation process. Another fallout of LIBs capacity gain is growing safety concerns due to fire risks, associated with the uncontrolled release of chemical energy. Herein, we test a hexakis(fluoroethoxy)phosphazene (HFEPN) as a multifunctional electrolyte additive designed to mitigate both issues. The flammability of HFEPN-containing electrolytes was evaluated using a self-extinguishing time test, while the electrochemical performance was assessed in Si/C composite||NMC pouch cells under a progressively accelerated cycling protocol. It is shown that the additive fully imparts flame-retardant properties to the electrolyte at a 15 wt% loading. Despite forming a more stable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) with enhanced interfacial kinetics the additive did not improve the cycling stability of the Si/C-based cells. The cells with 15 wt% HFEPN retained 43% of capacity after 70 cycles, comparable to 46.5% for the reference electrolyte. The diffusion limitations imposed by the increased electrolyte viscosity are assumed to offset the interfacial benefits of the additive. Thus, alongside the improved synthetic route, this study demonstrates that while HFEPN functions as an effective flame retardant and SEI modifier, its practical benefits for silicon anodes are limited at high concentrations by detrimental effects on electrolyte transport properties and should be improved in future molecular design efforts.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesElectrolytesFlame RetardantsLithiumOrganophosphorus CompoundsSiliconElectrodesElectrolytesFlame RetardantsLithiumOrganophosphorus CompoundsSiliconcycling stabilitycyclophosphazeneelectrolyte additiveflame retardantlithium-ion batteriesSi/C compositesolid–electrolyte interphase (SEI)

Identifiers

PMID41515908
PMCPMC12785324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.