ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Continuous Filament Fabrication Technology and Its Mechanical Properties for Thin-Walled Component.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Cellular Structures Under Static Tensile Loading in Standardized Specimens Manufactured by Photopolymerization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design and Performance Study of a Gradient Honeycomb Vibration-Damping Structure for the Knee Joint.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the presented research is to assess the possibility of manufacturing thin-walled models using innovative 3D printing technology and to determine limitations. This article presents the results of tensile tests of the Continuous Filament Fabrication (CFF) technology for thin-walled sample models. Two types of materials were tested. The first material is pure ONYX based on polyamide, and the second is ONYX with an additional core made of carbon fiber. The paper presents the limitations of using the core in thin-walled structures, and for pure ONYX material, samples were made with different orientations on the 3D printer platform, which allowed determining the effect of the printing direction on the mechanical properties of the samples. In addition, microscopic photographs of the fracture of the broken samples were taken in the paper, based on which the defects of the technological process were identified. It was shown that the strength of thin-walled samples (1 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.8 mm thick) printed in the Y direction is significantly greater than that of samples printed in the X and Z directions. For example, for 1 mm thick samples printed in the Y direction, the strength is 49.02 MPa, while for samples printed in the X and Z directions, it is 27.71 MPa and 21.28 MPa, respectively. The strength of samples (4 mm thick) reinforced with ONYX + OCF carbon fiber printed in the X direction is 191.36% greater than that of samples made of pure ONYX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.