ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Impact of Downward Load and Rotational Kinematics on Root Canal Instrumentation with a Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study analyzed how different downward loads and rotational kinematics influence NiTi rotary instrumentation outcomes. Heat-treated NiTi instruments were used to prepare extracted human single-rooted premolars with a moderate canal curvature. Instrumentation was performed using an automated endodontic instrumentation device with controlled downward loading and torque/force sensing, under different downward load settings (1, 2, and 3 N), employing either continuous rotation (CR) or optimum torque reverse (OTR) motion, which is a torque-sensitive reciprocation. Instrumentation was completed without instrument fracture or ledge formation in all six groups. OTR-3N specimens displayed a significantly lower upward force (i.e., screw-in force) than OTR-2N specimens (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.