Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41515774›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advanced High-Strength Medium-Manganese Steels as an Alternative to Conventional Forging Steels: A Review.

Aleksandra Kozłowska, Anna Wojtacha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandra KozłowskaDepartment of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 18A Konarskiego Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-3052
Anna WojtachaDepartment of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 18A Konarskiego Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-3101

Funding

National Centre for Research and Development LIDER/16/0090/L-12/20/NCBR/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review highlights conventional forging steels and advanced medium-Mn steels containing retained austenite (RA), emphasizing their potential for industrial forging applications. Modern steels intended for forgings are required to combine strength, ductility, toughness and fatigue resistance with good hardenability and machinability at minimal cost. Medium-Mn multiphase steels fulfill these requirements by the strain-induced martensitic transformation (SIMT) of fine, lath-type RA, which can create a strength-ductility balance. Ferritic-austenitic steels provide high ductility with moderate strength, martensitic-austenitic steels show very high strength at the expense of ductility, and bainitic-austenitic steels achieve intermediate properties. Impact toughness and fatigue resistance are strongly influenced by the morphology of RA. The lath-type RA enhances energy absorption and delays crack initiation, while blocky RA may promote intergranular fracture. Low carbon (0.2-0.3 wt.%) combined with elevated manganese (3-7 wt.%) contents provides superior hardenability and machinability, enabling cost-effective air-hardening of components with various cross-sections. Advanced medium-Mn steels provide a superior mechanical performance and economically attractive solution for modern forgings, exceeding the limitations of conventional steel grades.

Indexed as

advanced high-strength steelautomotive forgingscrack resistancefatigue behaviorimpact toughnessmedium-Mn steelretained austenite

Identifiers

PMID41515774
PMCPMC12787157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.