ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Synergistic Effects of Glass and Flax Fibers Reinforced in Fly Ash Geopolymer Matrix.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares fly-ash-based geopolymers reinforced with short glass fibers (GF) or flax fibers (FF). Four mixes were produced: reference (FA), 1 wt% GF, 1 wt% FF, and a hybrid (0.5 wt% GF + 0.5 wt% FF). These compositions were cast into prism and cube molds, cured at 75 °C for 24 h, and tested after 28 days. Mechanical testing included compressive strength and three-point bending, phase composition by XRD, and microstructure by optical and SEM microscopy. The GF composite showed the highest compressive strength (mean up to ~28-34 MPa versus ~17 MPa for the reference), while FF gave intermediate values (~11-22 MPa). During bending, the reference achieved the highest flexural strength (~5.5 MPa); fiber-reinforced mixes ranged from ~2.9 to 4.4 MPa. XRD indicated a typical amorphous aluminosilicate gel over crystalline remnants; SEM/optical observations revealed a denser, more compact matrix with fewer voids for GF systems, whereas FF and hybrid mixes exhibited localized porosity and fiber pull-out imprints affecting crack initiation/propagation. Overall, 1 wt% GF effectively enhances compressive performance and matrix densification, while fiber addition at the tested dosages does not improve flexural strength; optimizing fiber content/dispersion and interfacial treatment is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.