ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Monitoring and Control of the Direct Energy Deposition (DED) Additive Manufacturing Process Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustic Source Localisation of Crack Initiation During Laser-Based DED: Experimental Validation and Challenges.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DEM-Based Investigation of Sand Mixing Ratio and Recoating Speed Effects on Recoating Performance and Mechanical Properties in 3D Sand Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Directed Energy Deposition (DED), as a core branch of additive manufacturing, encompasses two typical processes: laser directed energy deposition (LDED) and wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), which are widely used in manufacturing aerospace engine blades and core components of high-end equipment. In recent years, with the increasing adoption of deep learning (DL) technologies, the research focus in DED has gradually shifted from traditional "process parameter optimization" to "AI-driven process optimization" and "online real-time monitoring". Given the complex and distinct influence mechanisms of key parameters (such as laser power/arc current, scanning/travel speed) on melt pool behavior and forming quality in the two processes, the introduction of artificial intelligence to address both common and specific issues has become particularly necessary. This review systematically summarizes the application of DL techniques in both types of DED processes. It begins by outlining DL frameworks, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and reinforcement learning (RL), and their compatibility with DED data. Subsequently, it compares the application scenarios, monitoring accuracy, and applicability of AI in DED process monitoring across multiple dimensions, including process parameters, optical, thermal fields, acoustic signals, and multi-sensor fusion. The review further explores the potential and value of DL in closed-loop parameter adjustment and reinforcement learning control. Finally, it addresses current bottlenecks such as data quality and model interpretability, and outlines future research directions, aiming to provide theoretical and engineering references for the intelligent upgrade and quality improvement of both DED processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.