Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41515678›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Neural Network-Enabled Process Flowsheet for Industrial Shot Peening.

Langdon Feltner, Paul Mort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Langdon FeltnerSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, 701 W Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN 47901, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-0965-5310
Paul MortSchool of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, 701 W Stadium Ave., West Lafayette, IN 47901, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1510-8105

Funding

Purdue University Center for Surface Engineering and Enhancement N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents a dynamic flowsheet model that predicts residual stress from shot peening. The peening medium is characterized by size and shape, and evolves dynamically with abrasion, fracture, classification, and replenishment. Because particle size and impact location vary stochastically, the resulting residual stress field is spatially heterogeneous. Residual stress fields are predicted in real time through a convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) neural network trained on finite element simulations, enabling fast, mechanistically grounded prediction of surface stress evolution under industrial shot peening conditions. We deploy the model in a pair of 10,000-cycle production peening case studies, demonstrating that media recharge strategy has a measurable effect on residual stress outcomes.

Indexed as

digital twinflowsheetmachine learningresidual stressshot peening

Identifiers

PMID41515678
PMCPMC12787048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.