ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Energy Evolution and Fine Structure Effects in Typical Rocks Subjected to Impact Loading.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the mechanical behavior and energy evolution characteristics of various rock materials under impact loading, dynamic impact tests were conducted on five representative rock types using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus, combined with X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. The dynamic mechanical response, energy characteristics, mineral composition, and associated microstructural features of these typical rocks were systematically analyzed. The results show that basalt exhibits the highest peak strength, followed by blue sandstone and granite; all three display typical brittle failure characteristics, whereas red sandstone and green sandstone demonstrate greater ductility and plastic deformation capacity. By introducing the energy-time density index, the energy-time density of the rocks ranks from strongest to weakest as follows: green sandstone, red sandstone, granite, blue sandstone, and basalt. An innovative dynamic strength-energy-time density mapping model was established to elucidate the clustering and distinguishing characteristics of these rock materials. Assay results and mesoscopic images confirm the relationship between mineral composition and the fine structure of rock fragmentation mechanisms, highlighting that the critical transition from intergranular to transgranular fracture is the key mechanism governing impact pulverization. Furthermore, fractal analysis reveals that higher fractal dimensions are associated with more complex microcrack structures and may correlate with the corresponding energy dissipation intensity. These findings provide profound insight into the failure mechanisms of rocks under dynamic loading, offering significant theoretical value and engineering application prospects, particularly in fields such as mining excavation and rock mass stability assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.