Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41515650›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Milestone to Ensure Safety and Efficacy of Companion Diagnostic (CDx) That Support Treatment Decisions in Cancer Patients.

Sulim Kang, Sungmin Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anatomy of a Setback: A Taxonomy of Clinical Trial Failures in Alzheimer's Disease and Strategic Lessons for the Future.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sulim KangDepartment of Regulatory Science for Bio-Health Medical Device, Dongguk University-Seoul, 26, Pil-dong 3-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2096-8575
Sungmin KimDepartment of Regulatory Science for Bio-Health Medical Device, Dongguk University-Seoul, 26, Pil-dong 3-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety RS-2024-00331775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As demand for biomarker-based companion diagnostics (CDx) tests in clinical oncology of precision medicine increases, a clear understanding of the regulatory framework (especially analytical and clinical performance) is imperative to ensure the safety and efficacy of CDx in enhancing patient quality of life and aiding in treatment decisions. This study analyzes the regulatory policies and approval reports in major countries and identifies regulatory checklists for the pre- and post-marketing analytical and clinical performance to ensure safety and efficacy of CDx. It categorizes the pre-marketing analysis into four commonly used techniques, IHC, FISH, PCR, and NGS, reflecting the diversity of CDx types. All analyses are grounded in the latest regulations and guidelines. The developed checklists were subjected to feasibility assessment by industry experts. Our analysis revealed that there are differences in the pre- and post-marketing regulatory frameworks for CDx, reflecting unique characteristics of each country. In particular, differences were observed in the safety and efficacy assessment methods applied to the platform based on technological principle. Evidence-based checklists are established, which support manufacturers in implementing efficient practices and creating systematic regulatory strategies. Furthermore, these checklists facilitate global market access, activate R&D, enhance clinical implementation, and improve licensing practices.

Indexed as

checklistcompanion diagnosticefficacyperformancesafety

Identifiers

PMID41515650
PMCPMC12785362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.