ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Understanding Current Trends and Advances in Transarterial Radioembolization Dosimetry.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an established therapy for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Outcomes depend heavily on dosimetry, which has evolved from empirical and body-surface-area methods to partition and voxel-based approaches. This review summarizes current evidence for advanced (personalized) dosimetry across tumor types, highlights emerging dose-response concepts, and outlines practical barriers and implementation strategies. A narrative review of peer-reviewed clinical studies and trials evaluating dosimetry in TARE, with emphasis on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), neuroendocrine tumor (NET), and breast cancer liver metastases, was performed with comparison of single-compartment medical internal radiation dosimetry method (MIRD), partition (multicompartment) methods, and voxel-based dosimetry methodologies. Personalized dosimetry improves outcomes in multiple tumor types. A randomized trial in HCC showed superior overall survival with partition-based dosing versus MIRD. In selective HCC treatments, voxel-derived metrics (e.g., D95) correlate with complete pathologic necrosis, suggesting benefit beyond mean dose targets. For iCCA, data associate higher tumor doses with better radiologic response, progression-free survival, and downstaging. In mCRC, voxel-based and threshold analyses link specific tumor and margin doses with metabolic/radiographic response and survival. Smaller series in NET and breast cancer indicate dose-response relationships using advanced dosimetry. Evidence supports broader adoption of advanced dosimetry in TARE. Emerging strategies that ensure adequate coverage of the "coldest" tumor regions and thoughtful particle-load planning may further optimize results. Standardized protocols, prospective validation, and scalable workflows are needed to accelerate implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.