ReviewNutrients2025
Micronutrient Differences in Conventionally and Organically Produced Foods.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Wheat Productivity Through Nutrient Interactions, Fertilizer Practices, and Genetic Improvement.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organic foods are often more expensive because the use of synthetic pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers is prohibited, and production generally requires more labor. Consumers may feel that organically produced foods are healthier than conventionally produced; however, studies on nutritional value are mixed. This review examines existing reports of micronutrients, including vitamins, minerals, and other bioactive compounds, in plant- and animal-based foods from organic and conventional systems. A literature review was conducted using keywords related to micronutrients, organic farming, and conventional farming. Because the number of available studies was limited, no publication date restrictions were applied. After a preliminary screening of abstracts to determine their relevance to the study's purpose, 120 articles were included. Reports are reviewed describing higher amounts of vitamin C, vitamin E, magnesium, iron, and polyphenols in organic produce and of certain animal products showing more antioxidants or fat-soluble vitamins. At the same time, many studies found no noteworthy differences, and some authors report higher nutrient levels in conventionally raised foods. Factors such as soil fertility, fertilizer use, and climate conditions may then influence micronutrient food content as much or more than farming methods. While organic foods may sometimes provide enhanced micronutrient levels, the overall evidence from existing literature does not support a consistent nutritional advantage associated with organic production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.