Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41515182›Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

Hydration of Workers in Thermal Environments-Practical Recommendation.

Joanna Orysiak, Magdalena Młynarczyk, Joanna Bugajska, Elżbieta Łastowiecka-Moras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanna OrysiakThe Department of Ergonomics, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska St. 16, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4998-2274
Magdalena MłynarczykThe Department of Ergonomics, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska St. 16, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9218-9781
Joanna BugajskaThe Department of Ergonomics, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska St. 16, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.
Elżbieta Łastowiecka-MorasThe Department of Ergonomics, Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Czerniakowska St. 16, 00-701 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1386-9613

Funding

Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy 2.SP.21Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy 3.ZS.12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of proper hydration for work performance in hot climates is well known, as opposed to its role in cold climates. Workers' water requirements may be high in both cold and hot environments, and the effects of dehydration can be a serious problem in either case. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recommend that workers drink small amounts (150-250 mL at once) of chilled water (especially in hot environments) or warm beverages (especially in cold environments) every 15-20 min (before they become thirsty) to stay well hydrated. However, individual hydration plans are now more preferred, as no single recommendation is suitable for everyone. Workers should stay hydrated before, during, and after work. The article presents the importance of adequate hydration of workers as well as some recommendations for fluid intake in the workplace.

Indexed as

DehydrationDrinkingHot TemperatureOccupational HealthCold TemperatureHumansUnited StatesWorking ConditionsWorkplacecold environmentfluid intakefluid recommendationhot environmenthydrationwork

Identifiers

PMID41515182
PMCPMC12787638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.