Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514984›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Discrepancy in Phenological Indicators from CO

Chuying Guo, Leiming Zhang, Peiyu Cao, Wenxing Luo, Rong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chuying GuoCollege of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China.
Leiming ZhangKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Peiyu CaoDepartment of Global Development, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5032-1991
Wenxing LuoCollege of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Rong HuangKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modelling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8955-7320

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32171560the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42141005the Special Project on National Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation of China 2021FY100701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different approaches have been developed to assess the phenological dynamics of ecosystems. However, diverse data sources and extraction methods for assessing ecosystem phenology can result in discrepant and inaccurate results, especially across different types of vegetation under various climate classifications. Based on the phenology of dominant plant species (Phe

Indexed as

autumn phenologycanopy structurephotosynthetic capacityplant phenologyvegetation compositionvegetation index

Identifiers

PMID41514984
PMCPMC12787492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.