ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Reciprocal BLUP: A Predictability-Guided Multi-Omics Framework for Plant Phenotype Prediction.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable improvement of crop performance requires integrative approaches that link genomic variation to phenotypic expression through intermediate molecular pathways. Here, we present Reciprocal Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (Reciprocal BLUP), a predictability-guided multi-omics framework that quantifies the cross-layer relationships among the genome, metabolome, and microbiome to enhance phenotype prediction. Using a panel of 198 soybean accessions grown under well-watered and drought conditions, we first evaluated four direction-specific prediction models (genome → microbiome, genome → metabolome, metabolome → microbiome, and microbiome → metabolome) to estimate the predictability of individual omics features. We evaluated whether subsets of features with high cross-omics predictability improved phenotype prediction. These cross-layer models identify features that play physiologically meaningful roles within multi-omics systems, enabling the prioritization of variables that capture coherent biological signals enriched with phenotype-relevant information. Consequently, metabolome features were highly predictable from microbiome data, whereas microbiome predictability from metabolomic data was weaker and more environmentally dependent, revealing an asymmetric relationship between these layers. In the subsequent phenotype prediction analysis, the model incorporating predictability-based feature selection substantially outperformed models using randomly selected features and achieved prediction accuracies comparable to those of the full-feature model. Under drought conditions, the phenotype prediction models based on metabolomic or microbiomic kernels (MetBLUP or MicroBLUP) outperformed the genomic baseline (GBLUP) for several biomass-related traits, indicating that the environment-responsive omics layers captured phenotypic variations that were not explained by additive genetic effects. Our results highlight the hierarchical interactions among genomic, metabolic, and microbial systems, with the metabolome functioning as an integrative mediator linking the genotype, environment, and microbiome composition. The Reciprocal BLUP framework provides a biologically interpretable and practical approach for integrating multi-omics data, improving phenotype prediction, and guiding omics-based feature selection in plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.