ArticleBiology2025
LazyNet: Interpretable ODE Modeling of Sparse CRISPR Single-Cell Screens Reveals New Biological Insights.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present LazyNet, a compact one-step neural-ODE model for single-cell CRISPR activation/interference (A/I) that operates directly on two-snapshot ("pre → post") measurements and yields parameters with clear mechanistic meaning. The core log-linear-exp residual block exactly represents multiplicative effects, so synergistic multi-locus responses appear as explicit components rather than opaque composites. On a 53k-cell × 18k-gene neuronal Perturb-seq matrix, a three-replica LazyNet ensemble trained under a matched 1 h budget achieved strong threshold-free ranking and competitive error (genome-wide r ≈ 0.67) while running on CPUs. For comparison, we instantiated transformer (scGPT-style) and state-space (RetNet/CellFM-style) architectures from random initialization and trained them from scratch on the same dataset and within the same 1 h cap on a GPU platform, without any large-scale pretraining or external data. Under these strictly controlled, low-data conditions, LazyNet matched or exceeded their predictive performance while using far fewer parameters and resources. A T-cell screen included only for generalization showed the same ranking advantage under the identical evaluation pipeline. Beyond prediction, LazyNet exposes directed, local elasticities; averaging Jacobians across replicas produces a consensus interaction matrix from which compact subgraphs are extracted and evaluated at the module level. The resulting networks show coherent enrichment against authoritative resources (large-scale co-expression and curated functional associations) and concordance with orthogonal GPX4-knockout proteomes, recovering known ferroptosis regulators and nominating testable links in a lysosomal-mitochondrial-immune module. These results position LazyNet as a practical option for from-scratch, low-data CRISPR A/I studies where large-scale pretraining of foundation models is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.