ArticleBiology2025
Basis Cranii Interna in Metopism: A Comparative Geometric Morphometric Study.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cranium is a highly integrated structure composed of partially independent yet interrelated modules with different origin and developmental pathways. Throughout growth, these modules interact extensively in response to various intrinsic and extrinsic factors, ultimately forming a cohesive and functionally unified structure. Consequently, morphological changes in one cranial unit are expected to influence the development and shape of others. Considering the known vault alterations associated with metopism, we assume that the cranial base is also modified in metopic skulls. To test this hypothesis, we compared shape and size of the internal cranial base in metopic (46) and control (183) dry crania of contemporary adult Bulgarian males using geometric morphometric techniques. The crania were scanned using an industrial µCT system. Three-dimensional coordinates of 37 (9 midsagittal and 14 bilateral) landmarks were recorded on the endocranial surface. The landmarks were grouped into four configurations outlining the internal cranial base and its compartments: anterior cranial fossa, middle cranial fossa, and posterior cranial fossa. No significant size differences were observed between the metopic and control series. Shape comparisons revealed significant differences in all configurations except the posterior cranial fossa. However, Principal Component Analysis did not demonstrate clear separation between the groups, indicating that the observed shape variation cannot be attributed solely to the persistence of the metopic suture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.