Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41514862›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

High-Accuracy Chicken Breed Identification Using Microsatellite Genotype Data and AutoGluon Framework.

Rajaonarison Faniriharisoa Maxime Toky, Sutthisak Sukhamsri, Sadeep Medhasi, Trifan Budi, Thitipong Panthum, Worapong Singchat, Kornsorn Srikulnath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rajaonarison Faniriharisoa Maxime TokyAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Sutthisak SukhamsriDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Science and Agricultural Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna Tak, Tak 63000, Thailand.
Sadeep MedhasiAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1082-5327
Trifan BudiAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Thitipong PanthumAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Worapong SingchatAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Kornsorn SrikulnathAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-7258

Funding

Betagro Group 6501.0901.1/68Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute FF(KU)25.64 and FF(KU)51.67National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) grant NRCT.MHESI/105/2564Thailand Science Research and Innovation through the Kasetsart University Reinventing Univer-sity Program 3/2564/24The Program Management Unit for Human Resources and Institutional Development and Inno-vation (PMU-B) under the Program of National Postdoctoral and Postgraduate System B137660130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The practical applications of breed identification are numerous and diverse, and they include breed conservation and breeding program design. However, distinguishing between breeds remains challenging and costly, especially for phenotypically similar chicken populations. Continued research is necessary to develop more accessible and optimized methodologies. To address these challenges, machine learning (ML) offers promising tools for analyzing complex genetic data. The capabilities of machine learning, especially the random forest (RF) model, to enhance various fields, including bioinformatics, have recently been demonstrated. In this study, microsatellite genotype data from 651 individuals across 30 chicken populations filtered from a larger initial dataset for consistency were used to classify breeds using an RF model. Cross-validation techniques, including 10-fold cross-validation and leave-one-out cross-validation, were employed to assess the performance of the model. The model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, Cohen's Kappa, 95% confidence interval, and F1-score. Results showed that the RF model achieved a 95.38% accuracy on the testing dataset. Accuracies of 91.44% and 90.99% were observed for 10-fold cross-validation and leave-one-out cross-validation, respectively. It is believed that larger datasets will significantly improve outcomes for other breeds. Because of its generalizability, the trained model can serve as a straightforward and modern method for chicken breed determination using machine learning. This study demonstrates that ML, particularly automated approaches like AutoGluon, provides a robust and accessible framework for chicken breed identification using cost-effective microsatellite data.

Indexed as

breed determinationchicken breedsmachine learningmicrosatelliterandom forest

Identifiers

PMID41514862
PMCPMC12785061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.